Genovice
See how your profile stacks up against this role.
We compared the job requirements to your profile to show where you're strong and where you fall short.
This is a remote position.
A growing technology company serving pharmaceutical and other regulated manufacturing environments is seeking an experienced CSV Quality Engineer Lead.
This is a Quality leadership role responsible for establishing and maintaining the company’s quality systems and providing independent oversight of computerized system validation activities.
The CSV Quality Engineer Lead will not serve as the primary validation executor or routine software tester. Engineering, Product, and designated validation resources will create requirements, conduct testing, and produce technical evidence. This role will provide Quality governance by defining expectations, reviewing and approving validation strategies and deliverables, assessing risk, identifying compliance gaps, and confirming that systems remain in a validated and controlled state.
The successful candidate will also build and mature the company’s quality infrastructure. This includes developing SOPs, implementing document and change controls, overseeing deviations and CAPAs, establishing training and supplier-quality processes, conducting quality reviews, and preparing the organization for customer audits.
This person must be able to maintain appropriate Quality independence while partnering constructively with Engineering, Product, Operations, and leadership.
Lead the development and continued improvement of the company’s quality management system
Conduct a QMS gap assessment and establish a risk-based implementation roadmap
Author, review, approve, and maintain quality policies, SOPs, work instructions, templates, and controlled records
Establish effective processes for:
Document and record control
Change control
Deviations and nonconformances
Corrective and preventive actions
Risk management
Training and training records
Supplier qualification and monitoring
Internal audits
Management review
Periodic system review
Quality review of product releases
Monitor adherence to approved quality procedures and follow up on identified gaps
Establish meaningful quality metrics and report risks, trends, and open actions to leadership
Ensure the quality system remains practical, scalable, and suitable for a growing technology organization
Establish the company’s policies and standards for computerized system validation
Provide independent Quality oversight of validation activities performed by Engineering, Product, suppliers, customers, or other validation resources
Review and approve validation plans, intended-use statements, requirements, risk assessments, traceability matrices, test strategies, protocols, deviations, and validation summary reports
Confirm that validation scope and evidence are appropriate for the system’s intended use, complexity, and risk
Verify that requirements are clear, testable, approved, and traceable to suitable evidence
Assess whether engineering and supplier testing can be leveraged as validation evidence
Identify circumstances requiring additional verification or independent Quality review
Review validation deviations and ensure they are appropriately investigated, documented, resolved, and approved
Confirm that controls for audit trails, electronic signatures, user access, security, backup, recovery, data retention, and archiving meet applicable expectations
Ensure systems are maintained in a validated state through controlled changes, periodic reviews, and documented risk assessments
Provide Quality approval for validation completion and regulated product releases
Escalate material quality, compliance, and data-integrity risks to leadership
Prepare the organization for customer audits, supplier assessments, and regulatory inspections
Maintain organized, complete, and inspection-ready quality records
Support customer questionnaires, quality agreements, validation requests, and due-diligence reviews
Represent Quality during customer audits and explain the company’s QMS and validation-governance approach
Coordinate responses to audit observations and oversee corrective actions through closure
Review suppliers that could affect product quality, data integrity, regulatory compliance, or the validated state
At least 7 years of Quality experience in pharmaceutical, biotechnology, life-sciences technology, or another highly regulated environment
Demonstrated experience developing, implementing, or significantly improving a quality management system
Strong experience providing independent Quality oversight of computerized system validation
Clear understanding of the distinction between validation execution and Quality review, approval, and governance
Experience reviewing and approving validation plans, requirements, risk assessments, traceability matrices, test evidence, deviations, and summary reports
Strong working knowledge of:
FDA 21 CFR Part 11
EU GMP Annex 11
PIC/S GMP expectations
GAMP 5
ALCOA+ data-integrity principles
Experience with document control, change control, CAPA, deviations, training, supplier quality, internal audits, and management review
Experience assessing the adequacy and traceability of software-testing evidence without acting as the routine software tester
Experience supporting customer audits or regulatory inspections
Excellent technical writing, judgment, organization, and communication skills
Ability to work independently while maintaining effective partnerships across technical and business teams
Reliable availability for approximately 20 hours per week
Experience building a fit-for-purpose QMS for a software, SaaS, IoT, laboratory technology, or life-sciences technology company
Experience overseeing validation of systems combining software, hardware, edge devices, scientific instruments, and external integrations
Familiarity with LIMS, MES, ELN, QMS, laboratory automation, or scientific instrument connectivity
Experience with quality expectations in the United States, Europe, and Asia-Pacific
Familiarity with Japan’s PMDA and other Asia-Pacific authorities operating within or aligned with PIC/S frameworks
Experience reviewing cloud infrastructure and third-party technology providers from a Quality and validation perspective
Ability to introduce appropriate regulatory rigor without creating unnecessary bureaucracy
After you apply, unlock the direct contact details of the people who actually make the call. A quick follow-up makes you 5x more likely to land an interview.
Marcus Rivera
Chief Revenue Officer

Alpaca

Kadince

Samsung Food

Indium Software

Zoftify — Travel Software Development

Genovice